Sunday, March 18, 2018

Proving the Existence of God is Easy: a Logic-Based Proof

It always makes me laugh when I hear people say, "You can't prove or disprove the existence of God."

I just think it's one of the funniest and least logical things a person could say.

Logically speaking if something does exist you by definition can prove that it exists.

If there is no evidence for something's existence then it by definition does not exist.


It also makes me laugh because proving God exists is actually super easy. Here goes:

First we need to define what God is:

God
ɡäd/
noun
  1. 1.
    (in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) the creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.

Thanks google. I'm not Christian, but we'll go with this definition since it's a popular one in the US and Europe.

Given: God is the creator and ruler of the universe and a supreme being.

Given: the force of gravity is real.

Also given: it has been shown through direct observation, and logical and mathematical extrapolation that the force of gravity and the electromagnetic forces are the primary means by which stars, planets and all matter beyond lithium form and were formed.

The entirety of the universe was formed through a handful of forces but the force primarily responsible for forming stars and planets was gravity. Every particle of matter takes part in the force of gravity therefore everything that exists is the creator.

Everything that exists is the creator and the creator is God therefore God by definition exists (transitive property of equality).

Proof that God is all powerful:
Given: Power is defined by energy per unit time.

If one possessed all the energy in the universe one would be all powerful.

Given: energy is defined by the ability to do work and work is defined by moving matter a certain distance with a certain force.

If one were defined as everything in the universe one would by definition include all matter and all forces and therefore all energy and all power.

Conclusion: My God is all powerful (i.e. supreme)


Now you might say, "Hold on there just a minute! That's not what God is like at all!"

But hey, that's what my god is like and I can prove my god exists, and I can prove my god is all powerful. So, if you think your god is better then prove it.


Saturday, March 17, 2018

How to use a controller, keyboard and mouse at the same time in Skyrim

I really love the video game Skyrim. I found it such an awe inspiring human creation. It's such a beautiful game.  Having said that, I really dislike one thing about it: Skyrim completely disables the keyboard and mouse when you connect an Xbox controller. Why? It makes no sense!

I searched from forum to forum to find a way around this and I found only partial solutions that were reasonable complicated, but I decided to figure out a simple solution that not only works, it gives me full control of all keyboard functions with my controller.

It's actually pretty simple. The first thing I had to do is disable the controller support in the game.


  1. Click View in a file explorer window and check "Hidden items"
  2. Go to the follow path C:\Users\your_name_here\Documents\My Games\Skyrim
  3. Right click on SkyrimPrefs.ini and select edit
  4. Search for the line bGamepadEnable=1 and change it to bGamepadEnable=0
  5. Download Antimicro and install it.
  6. Turn your controller on.
  7. Map the keys to whatever keyboard and mouse functions you want or download the one I use (which I think is totally awesome).
  8. Play Skyrim and enjoy your freedom to switch back and forth from keyboard, mouse and controller at your whimsy. 
The Antimicro file I use for skyrim does the following:
A jumps, B sneeks/crouches, x picks stuff up, Y equips weapon
start is escape
back is the character menu
left stick is WASD
right stick is the mouse
right trigger is attack/left mouse
left trigger is left hand attack/right mouse
left stick button is run.
The D-pad is mapped to the map, the C key and some other stuff.

But the really cool thing is what the left and right shoulder buttons do. Hold down the left shoulder button and it shifts all the buttons to the shortcut keys 1-8.
Hold down the right shoulder button and the left shoulder button becomes the shout key and the other buttons become unused keys on the keyboard that can be mapped to whatever you want if your using mods like Convenient horses etc.

Anyway, if this brightens the day of a single Skyrim fanatic out there then my joy is full.

Wednesday, March 14, 2018

Random Thought #5

Have you ever noticed how the phrase "I'm addicted" sounds a lot like "I'm a dick head?"

Friday, March 9, 2018

Random Thought #4

The world teaches to embrace the light and shun the darkness, but it is the darkness that makes the tiny specks of light in the night sky beautiful.

There is no beauty without light, and no beauty without darkness.

Thursday, March 8, 2018

Random Thought #3

Whenever I hear someone say, "sweet Jesus!" I think, "sour Jesus!" because Jesus was Asian and I could really go for some sweet and sour chicken.

Oh my, that makes it sound like I want to eat Jesus.... But I just couldn't eat the flesh of Christ: I'm not Catholic.

Stupid English Letters and Letter Combinations.... Why can't English be more fonetik?


How is it that we live in an age of technological progression, yet we seems content with the stupidity of the English language.  

English is an ugly dirty mongrel dog that needs a good bath, and some TLC.

In 1806 good old Noah Webster published his first dictionary which included a commentary on the oddities of English spelling which helped to reform ridiculous English spellings such as colour to color, but of course the British held on to their colour because they are such colourful chaps after all.

But why didn't Webster go even further?

Let's start with the ph for example. Why does the combination ph even exist? It's only purpose is to indicate etymology. Good on the Italian language for getting rid of all these damned ph's and replacing them with old fashioned f's.  Yes, I love how the Italians just said F' it these ph's F'in suck balls.

How ironic is it that even the very word that means it is spelled exactly how it sounds isn't even spelled exactly how it sounds? There's nothing phonetic about phonetic! We could at least have to common decency to spell phonetic fonetikly!

And why does the letter c even exist? I mean the letter C totally has a case of associative identity disorder: sometimes it's an S and sometimes it's a K and sometimes it's a sh and sometimes it's a ch. My poor dear letter C you need some counseling.

Science is such an unscientific word... siens would make more sense, but damn it siens looks like seens! How do we fix this mess?

Well for starters if the C is making an S sound let's write an S instead, if it's making a K sound then let's write a K instead. Am I suggesting we get rid of c altogether? Not at all. I'm suggesting we give the letter C new purpose and meaning by replacing the CH sound with C and the SH sound with CC since the SH sound is just a sustained CH sound anyway. AND while we're on the topic all these words that end in tion or sion or cion let's just replace all that crap with cun (yeah the o to make schwa sound makes no sense, and schwa, really? did you have to be spelled that way? You're cwa to me from now on).

So English, let's have a cat about your other iccues.

Why does x exist? Why? It's easy (damn s should never make a z sound I mean what the hell do we have z for if we don't use it!)... it's eezy to say that x makes an ks sound and culd be replased with ks, but it's not even that simple (what is that e even doing at the end of simple? That's not simpl at all) for example: example isn't said eksampl, it's said egzampl. So sometimes the x needs to be replaced with gz not ks, but either way the letter x is useless. You're utterly (why the useless double letters?) utterly useles you letter X! So let's cros you out of the Englic language.

Don't get me started on the qu kombinacun. Wy (useless h's we don't pronounce anymore) does this egzist? The letter q is even mor useles than x. Al q's can be replased with k's and al qu kombinacuns can be replased with kw. So, kwik and eezy even an MS word find and replase funkcun could do it... ugh, hold on the n in function isn't an n sound at all it's an ng sound like in among or going. I guess we could replace the ng sound everywhere with ng but then fungcun looks too much like an exkrecun frum a fungus... and isn't fungus an interesting word in that ng doesn't just make the ng sound like in among it also makes the g sound. So, we're not using the stupid letter q anymore and it looks kind of like a g so let's just replace all the ng sounds with q's. I wonder how that would fugcun in praktis?

Damn... this is getting complicated, and we haven't even looked at the worst part about English phonetics! The fact we only have 5 vowels, but well over 14 vowel sounds! For example:

The o in for is not the same o sound in toe, which is not the same o sound in operation, which is not the same o sound in sound which is not the same o sound in does which is not the same o sound in do, which is not the same o sound in book which is not the same o sound in function!!!!! How does this even function when we are using the same letter for more than 8 different vowel sounds? And we wonder why it's difficult for foreigners to learn English....

There are standardized ways of writing English phonetically using the IPA (International Phonetic Alphabet) but the IPA requires special characters now found on the English keyboard. If we were really to put into practice a phonetic version of English then we would either need to replace the millions of keyboards out there with ones containing phonetic characters or we could re-purpose the Latin ones and create an orthography like this one:

a - awesome
u - but
e - hello
i - bit

ay - eye
ae - apple
ey - ate
y - eat

o - oat
oo - book
uu - too
oy - boy

h - hat
y - yes
m - man
w - water
p - pat
b - bat
f - fat
v - vat

th - thin
dh - there
t - tin
d - dare
s - sin
z - zoo
n - never
l - list

c - chat
j - jerky
cc - shoe
x - confusion (I thought about replacing it with jj since it's just a sustained j sound but x would be lonely and unused otherwise)
r - rat
ny - lasagna (actually an Italian word, but who doesn't love lasagna?)

k - kill
g - girl
q - among

Even with this orthography we needed to have some double letter combinations because there are more consonant sounds in English than there are letters. Also, this is even oversimplified there are multiple R sounds in English (some that use the tip of the tongue others use the back of the tongue and palate/uvula area) the same with the L sound. Also, like I said, English has 14+ distinct vowel sounds but some are similar enough (like the o in does and function) that the distinction only exists for ease of pronunciation due to the accenting or surrounding consonant characters. If we combine these very similar vowel sounds we are left with 12 basic distinct vowel sounds (including a few diphthongs).

So what would phonetic English look like?

It wood look sumthiq layk dhis. Ay don't thiqk it looks very nays tuu bee anest, but hey, aet leest it's fonetik aend ey lat uv dhu werdz didn't eeven ceynj. Dhu best thiq ubaewt it iz wee kaen stil yuuz dhu Laetin keebord! So, no need to reepleys al uv aewr teknalogy.

So, nekst taym sumwun seyz it's speld haew it saewnds cal dhem aewt for beeiq dhu filthy layr dhat dhey ar.


Cruel and Unusual Punishment: Everything Wrong With the American Public Education System Part 2

The environment most children are required to endure in American Public Education is abusive is many ways. Here is a simple, yet important, example of such abuse:

We require our children to sit in these desks from hell for about 8 hours a day 5 days a week:

Image result for school desk
Except they don't even look this new because the ones our kids are using are like 35+ years old. The baskets on the bottom were all broken off years ago and the legs are all bent out of shape. But even if these were new the seats are rock hard! Yes rock hard! These things are harder than the old wooden seats kids used to sit in back in the olden days. Sitting in one for 5 minutes is painful enough, but expecting our kids to sit in them for 7 to 8 hours while listening to boring lectures and being forced to remain seated even if they are experiencing extreme discomfort from sitting so much is obscene!

Not to mention that these desks are too small for some of our students to even fit in! Talk about large body size shaming....

Studies have shown that remaining sedentary for long periods of time is very destructive to ones health. Side effects include (but are not limited to the following):  weakening of the heart (leading to heart disease and sometimes death), muscle atrophy, back problems, digestive disorders, bone deterioration, etc.

As a teacher I always tried my best to allow students time to get up and move around, and if they were feeling any discomfort I wanted them to be able to stand up and take a break from sitting for a while. Unfortunately, the school systems often don't give teachers even this much freedom. I was constantly questioned by administrators about why my students weren't always in their seats being obedient little robots with bad backs and was given poor evaluations because this was seen as a lack of conformity and obedience: even after explaining why I let them stand up in the back of class if they needed to.

This is only one of the many cases I found myself being coerced by the school system to go against my code of ethics. I became so disgusted with the person the school system expected me to be if I were to keep my job I had to quit, but I feel terrible leaving my students because I know the majority of people completely ignore their plights.

The sad truth is this problem is super easy to fix! Yeah, it's super easy to fix!
All we need to do is get rid of these damn torture devices and replace them with more ergonomic seating:

Give them some real chairs to sit in:
Image result for mesh office chair
Replace desks with tables so the students can position themselves comfortably.

Put standing desks in the back of the room for kids that want to stand and seated desks for kids than need to or want to sit in the front.

"But that would be too expensive!" People say.... Well, not really, because the desks we are putting in new schools costs about the same amount as these alternatives, and guess what? Chairs, desks, and tables are a pretty old technology and they aren't hard to build either. Why not put shop/welding classes to use in creating things that actually improve the school? Or, here's another idea why don't we get rid of the government assholes who currently govern public education and high some people who actually care about funding our schools! I mean, there are american public schools who can't even afford to pay for heating and air conditioning or patching their leaky roofs!

I don't give a damn how expensive it would be to make school a positive and safe place for our kids, they are worth it! I'll repeat, they are worth it!

I have a few choice words for president Trump: instead of spending billions building a fucking wall please use that money for the sake of our children!

To all of you who voted for Trump I say this: in that vote you chose to put your xenophobia before our children. Change your evil ways and start giving a damn about our kids. We don't need a wall. We need education. We don't need to focus on gun control: we need to focus on educating people to value life, and how about we start by valuing the lives of our children--because they certainly don't feel valued. We don't need to focus on climate change: we need to focus on educating our children about the impact our wastefulness is having on our planet. 

Ok, I could rant on for hours....

There's an even more obvious solution to this problem: how about we alter the structure of public schooling so physical activity and physical freedom are integrated into the system?

How about we have a system that doesn't require students to ask permission to use the bathroom? How disgusting is this? It's a violation of human nature! And I'm proud to say my students didn't have to. They simply had to sign out and take a hall pass. That way class wasn't disrupted, they didn't have to announce to everyone, "Hey I've got to pee. Is that okay with you?" and I had a log where I could keep track of where every one was.

Our students need more freedom and more respect.

I've heard people argue: parents, teachers, administrators that if we gave our students nice things they would destroy them.

Well, I know from experience this is NOT the case. I've worked in schools what worked with some previously 'troubled' teens who didn't make it in standard school systems. These schools surprisingly had nice seating, very nice facilities and guess what? They stayed in pristine condition.

The fact is our students treat things like desks in schools like crap for this reason: the desks are crap. 

So, let's stop violating our students human rights and petition for better seating arrangements, more break time in class, and more freedom for our kids to move their bodies: that's kind of what they were made for.